Special Interest Articles
Peak Athletic Performance and Vitamin D
"No way doc." I had just finished telling
my patient about the benefits of vitamin D,
telling him he should take 4,000 IU per day,
using all the techniques I had learned in 30
years of medical practice to convince someone
proper treatment is important. But, he knew the
U.S. government said he only needed 200 IU per
day, not 4,000. He also knew the official Upper
Limit was 2,000 IU a day. "What are you trying
to do doc, kill me?" I told him his
25(OH)-vitamin D blood test was low, only 13 ng/ml.
He had read about that too, in a medical
textbook, where it said normal levels are
between 10 and 40 ng/ml. "I'm fine doc;"
adding "Are you in the vitamin business?" I
explained I was not; that the government used
outdated values; that recent studies indicate
ideal 25(OH)D levels are about 50 ng/ml; and
that they indicated that he needed about 4,000
IU per day to get his level up to 50. "No
thanks doc, I'm fine."
So I tried a different tact—I brought copies of
recent press articles and asked him to take a
look at them. Science News called
vitamin D the "Antibiotic Vitamin."
Janet RaloffThe Antibiotic Vitamin.Science
News, Vol. 170, No. 20, p. 312, 2006.11.11.
The Independent in England says
vitamin D explains why people die from influenza
in the winter, and not the summer.
Jeremy LauranceBottled sunshine: The
value of vitamin D.The Independent,
2006.09.13. U.S. News and World Report
says almost everyone needs more.
Deborah KotzThe ABCs of D.U.S.
News and World Report, 2006.12.10.
Newsweek says it prevents cancer and helps
fight infection.
Meir J. Stampfer MD DrPHVitamin D in the
Spotlight.2006 Newsweek, Inc.
United Press International says that it
reduces falls in the elderly,
Vitamin D may reduce falls in elderly.United
Press International, 2007.02.22. reduces
stress fractures,
Calcium, vitamin D reduce stress
fractures.United Press International,
2007.02.12. helps heal wounds,
Vitamin D needed to heal skin wound.United
Press International, 2007.02.09. and that
many pregnant women are deficient in the
vitamin.
Vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy.United
Press International, 2007.02.27.
He glanced at the articles, showing a little
interest in stress fractures. Then he told me
what he was really thinking. "Look doc, all
this stuff may be important to old guys like
you. I'm 22. All I care about are girls and
sports. When I get older, maybe I'll think
about it. I'm too young to worry about it. I'm
in great condition." I couldn't argue. He was
in good health and a very good basketball
player, playing several hours every day, always
on indoor courts.
What could I do to open his eyes? As an African
American, his risk of early death was very high,
although the risk for blacks doesn't start to
dramatically increase until their 40's and
50's. Like all young people, he saw himself as
forever young. The U.S. government was no help,
relying on a ten-year-old report from the
Institute of Medicine that is full of
misinformation.
I tired to tell him that the 200 IU per day the
U.S. government recommends for 20-year-olds is
to prevent bone disease, not to treat low
vitamin D levels like his. I pointed out the
U.S. government's official current Upper Limit
of 2,000 IU/day is the same for a 300 pound
adult as it is for a 25 pound toddler. That is,
the government says it's safe for a
one-year-old, 25-pound, child to take 2,000 IU
per day but it's not safe for a 30-year old,
300-pound, adult to take 2,000 and one IU a
day. I mean, whoever thought up these Upper
Limits must have left their thinking caps at
home. Nevertheless, nothing worked. My vitamin
D deficient patient was not interested in taking
any vitamin D.
What are young men interested in? I remembered
that he had told me: "Sex and sports." Two
years ago I had researched the medical
literature looking for any evidence vitamin D
enhanced sexual performance. Absolutely
nothing. That would have been nice. Can you
imagine the interest?
Then I remembered that several readers had
written to ask me if vitamin D could possibly
improve their athletic performance? They told
me that after taking 2,000 to 5,000 IU per day
for several months, they seemed just a little
faster, a little stronger, maybe had a little
better balance and timing. A pianist had
written to tell me she even played a better
piano, her fingers moved over the keys more
effortlessly! Was vitamin D responsible for
these subtle changes or was it a placebo
effect? That is, did readers just think their
athletic performance improved because they knew
vitamin D was a steroid hormone precursor
(hormone, from the Greek, meaning "to set in
motion")?
The active form of vitamin D is a
steroid (actually a seco-steroid) in the same
way that testosterone is a steroid and vitamin D
is a hormone in the same way that growth
hormone is a hormone. Steroid hormones
are substances made from cholesterol, which
circulate in the body, and work at distant sites
by "setting in motion" genetic protein
transcription. That is, both vitamin D and
testosterone regulate your genome, the stuff of
life. While testosterone is a sex steroid
hormone, vitamin D is a pleomorphic (multiple
function) steroid hormone.
All of a sudden, it didn't seem so silly.
Certainly steroids can improve athletic
performance although they can be quite
dangerous. In addition, few people are
deficient in growth hormone or testosterone, so
when athletes take sex steroids or growth
hormone they are cheating, or doping. The case
with vitamin D is quite different because
natural vitamin D levels are about 50 ng/ml and,
since almost no one has such levels, extra
vitamin D is not doping, it's just good
treatment. I decided to exhaustively research
the medical literature on vitamin D and athletic
performance. It took me over a year.
To my surprise, I discovered that there are five
totally independent bodies of research that all
converge on an inescapable conclusion: vitamin
D will improve athletic performance in vitamin D
deficient people (and that includes most
people). Even more interesting is who published
this literature, and when. Are you old enough
to remember when the Germans and Russians won
every Olympics in the 60's and 70's? Well, it
turns out that the most convincing evidence that
vitamin D improves athletic performance was
published in old German and Russian medical
literature.
With the help of my wife and mother-in-law, both
of whom are Russian, and with the help of Marc
Sorenson, whose book
Solar Power
is a must read, I finally was able to look at
translations of much of the old Russian and
German literature. When one combines that old
literature with the modern English language
literature on neuromuscular performance, the
conclusion is inescapable. The readers who
wrote me are right.
If you are vitamin D deficient, the medical
literature indicates that the right amount of
vitamin D will make you faster, stronger,
improve your balance and timing, etc. How much
it will improve your athletic ability depends on
how deficient you are to begin with. How good
an athlete you will be depends on your innate
ability, training, and dedication. However,
peak athletic performance also depends upon the
neuromuscular cells in your body and
brain having unfettered access to the steroid
hormone, activated vitamin D. In addition, how
much activated vitamin D is available to your
brain, muscle, and nerves depends on having
ideal levels of vitamin D in your blood - about
50 ng/ml, to be precise.
Why would I write about such a frivolous topic
like peak athletic performance when cancer
patients all across this land are dying vitamin
D deficient? Like many vitamin D advocates, I
have been disappointed that the medical
profession and the public don't seem to care
about vitamin D. Maybe people, like my young
basketball player, will care if it makes better
athletes. So, Hey! You jocks! Listen up! I'm
talking speed, balance, choice reaction time,
muscle mass, muscle strength, squats, reps,
etc. Important stuff. Here's the Vitamin D
Council's first ever sports quiz.
1. Vitamin D-producing UVB radiation improves
athletic performance and may have been widely
practiced by German and Russian Olympic athletes in
the 1960's and 70's.
True. I found tantalizing evidence the Russians
and especially the Germans were on to this
during the 60's and 70's when those two nations
took turns placing number one and number two
in the Olympics every year?
For example, in 1938, Russian researchers
reported that a course of ultraviolet
irradiations improved speed in the 100-meter
dash in college students compared to matched
controls, both groups undergoing daily training.
Average 100-meter dash times decreased from
13.51 seconds to 13.28 seconds in
the non-irradiated controls, but from 13.63
seconds to 12.62 seconds in the irradiated
students. Here we see training improved times
but training and irradiation improved times much
more. Obviously, irradiation or vitamin D would
not render the same magnitude of improvements in
world-class sprinters, but they would be happy
with a few milliseconds.
Gorkin Z, Gorkin MJ, Teslenko NE. [The effect of
ultraviolet irradiation upon training for 100m
sprint.] The Journal of Physiology of the USSR
[Fiziol, z. (RSSR)] 1938; 25: 695-701. (In
Russian)
If you want to know what early German thinking
was on this, read this summation of the German
literature:
"It is a well-known fact that physical
performance can be increased through
ultra-violet irradiation. In 1927, a heated
argument arose after the decision by the German
Swimmers' Association to use the sunlamp as an
artificial aid, constituting an athletic
unfairness, doping, so to speak. In 1926,
Rancken
had already reported the improving effect of
sunlamp irradiation on muscle work with the
hand-dynamo-graph.
Heib
observed an improvement in swimming times after
repeated irradiations. In thorough experiments,
Backmund
showed that a substantial increase in muscle
activity happens after radiation of larger
portions of the body with an artificial sunlamp;
that this performance increase is not caused
through local - direct or indirect - effects on
the musculature, but through a general effect.
This general effect, triggered by ultra-violet
irradiation, is caused by a systemic effect on
the nervous system." (p. 17)
Parade GW, Otto H. Die beeinflussung der
leistungsfahigkeit durch Hohensonnenbestrahlung.
Zeitschrift fur Klinische Medizin (Z Klin
Med),1940;137:17-21
[In German]
In 1945, two Americans measured the
cardiovascular fitness and muscular endurance of
11 male Illinois subjects undergoing training in
an indoor physical education class, comparing
them to 10 matched controls. Both groups
underwent similar physical training. Treatment
consisted of ultraviolet irradiation, given in
the nude, up to two minutes per session, three
times per week, for ten weeks in the late fall
and winter. After ten weeks, the treatment
group had a 19% standard score gain in
cardiovascular fitness compare to a 2%
improvement in the control students. To regular
readers of this newsletter, it should come as no
surprise that the un-irradiated control group
reported twice as many viral respiratory
infections as the treatment group.
Allen R, Cureton T. Effects of Ultraviolet
Radiation on Physical Fitness. Arch Phys Med
1945: 10: 641-44.
In 1952, the German sports medicine researcher,
Spellerberg, reported on the effects of
wholesale irradiation of athletes studying and
training at the Sports College of Cologne -
including many elite athletes - with a "central
sun lamp." He irradiated the athletes in their
bathing suits, on both sides of their bodies,
for up to ten minutes, twice a week, for 6
weeks. He reported a "convincing effect" on
athletic performance and a 50% reduction in
sports injuries. Results were particularly
impressive for swimmers, soccer, handball,
hockey, and tennis players, as well as for
boxers and most track and field athletes. He
reported that irradiation leading to burns,
further irradiation of athletes having achieved
peak performance, and irradiation within 24
hours of competition, all impaired athletic
performance. Their results were so convincing,
the Sports College of Cologne officially
notified the "national German and International
Olympic committee." (p. 570)
Spellerberg AE.
[Increase of athletic effectiveness by
systematic ultraviolet irradiation.]
Strahlentherapie 1952; 88: 567-70.
[In German]
In 1952, Ronge exposed 120 German schoolchildren
to UV lights installed in classrooms and
compared them to 120 un-irradiated control
children.
Over a two-year period - excluding summer
vacations - he tested both groups with a series
of six cardiovascular fitness tests using a bike
ergometer. Un-irradiated children showed a
distinct seasonality in fitness, with the
highest values right after summer break and the
lowest values in the spring. Treated children
showed no seasonal differences in physical
performance. Differences in work performance
between the irradiated and un-irradiated
children were most conspicuous in the spring
with 56% difference between the two groups. In
a final experiment, he gave 30 children in the
control classrooms 6.25 mg (250,000 IU) of
vitamin D as a single dose in February and found
their performance had "increased considerably,"
one month later but did not report the actual
numbers. He concluded that vitamin D, either as
a supplement or induced via UV irradiation,
improved physical performance.
Ronge HE. [Increase of physical effectiveness by
systematic ultraviolet irradiation.]
Strahlentherapie 1952; 88: 563-6. [In German]
In 1954, another researcher, at the Max-Planck
Institute for Industrial Physiology in Dortmund,
Germany, administered three different
wavelengths of UV light over 8 weeks
to university students. He found that
ultraviolet light in the vitamin D-producing UVB
range was consistently effective in reducing
resting pulse, lowering the basal metabolic
rate, and increasing athletic performance. UVA
had no effect; interestingly, artificial UVC
irradiation (the atmosphere normally completely
filters out UVC radiation and thus it's not
naturally present on earth) also gave some
positive results.
Lehmann G. [Significance of certain wave lengths
for increased efficacy of ultraviolet
irradiation.] Strahlentherapie. 1954
Nov;95(3):447-53. [In German]
In 1956, Hettinger and Seidel irradiated seven
subjects in two different experiments: athletic
performance on bike-ergometers and forearm
muscle strength. They found that UV radiation
induced a significant improvement in both muscle
strength and athletic performance.
Hettinger T,
Seidl E. [Ultraviolet irradiation and
trainability of musculature.] Internationale
Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie,
einschliesslich Arbeitsphysiologie 1956; 16:
177-83.
[In German]
Another German researcher, at the Institute for
Medical Physics and Biophysics at the University
of Gottiingen, studied reaction times (the time
needed to recognize a light and switch it off)
during October and November in a series of
controlled experiments on 16 children and an
unspecified number of adults. He first
controlled for practice effects (getting better
by practicing) and then administered nine
full-body UV radiation treatments over three
weeks to the two treatment groups, using placebo
radiation in the two control groups. UV
radiation improved choice reaction time by 25%
in children and 20% in adults while reaction
time worsened in controls. The improvements in
the irradiated groups peaked at the end of the
three weeks of UV treatments and reverted to
baseline levels three weeks later. In the two
control groups, he found distinctly improved
reaction times in the sunnier months.
Sigmund R.
[Effect of ultraviolet rays on reaction time in
man.] Strahlentherapie. 1956; 101: 623-9.
[In German]
The next study threw me because it was very well
conducted, meticulously designed, and completely
negative. In 1963, Berven reported on the
effects of ultraviolet irradiation and vitamin D
supplementation in a group of 30 Stockholm
schoolchildren, aged 10 -11, comparing them to
appropriate controls. He found no seasonality of
fitness in the control group and no effect from
either irradiation or two different vitamin D
supplementation protocols (1500 IU of
cholecalciferol daily for two months and a
single dose of 400,000 IU of ergocalciferol) on
performance on a bike ergometer.
Berven H. The physical working capacity of
healthy children; seasonal variations and effect
of ultraviolet irradiation and vitamin-D supply.
Acta paediatrica. Supplementum 1963; 148: 1-22.
However, two things were not right and got me
thinking. One, Berven found no seasonality of
physical fitness and was the only author who
found no such seasonal variations in athletic
performance. Second, he found no effect from
irradiation, again, the only author. Then I
realized he was working with Swedish children in
the late 1950's. Supplementation of children
with high doses of vitamin D - often as cod
liver oil - was routine in Scandinavia in the
past, particularly in children. For example, in
neighboring Finland, the official recommended
daily dose of vitamin D for children - including
infants - was 4,000 IU per day until 1964, when
authorities reduced it to 2,000 IU/day. (That's
right, you read that correctly, 4,000 IU per day
for infants, which is too much by the way.)
In 1975, Finnish authorities reduced it to 1,000
IU per day, and, in 1992, to 400 IU per day. I
emailed Professor Elina Hypponen who confirmed
that the Swedish recommendations were similar to
the Finnish ones. Therefore, it seems highly
unlikely that many of Berven's Swedish children,
studied in 1958 and 1959, all from "families
with a good standard of living," were vitamin D
deficient. Therefore, this study showed that
vitamin D will not improve athletic ability in
vitamin D replete people. That's very important
because it indicates more is not necessarily
better. More is only better if you are not
taking enough.
Hypponen E, et al. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study. Lancet. 2001 Nov 3;358(9292):1500-3.
In the 1960's, three American
researchers conducted experiments with
university students. Rosentswieg studied
the effects of a single six-minute dose
of UV light on each side of the trunk in
23 college women, recording changes in
various tests of muscle strength at one
and five hours. He found a trend
towards significance after five hours in
white but not African American
students. In 1968, Cheatum found that a
six-minute administration of UV light,
on each side of the trunk, increased the
speed of 15 college women in the 30-yard
dash. In 1969, Rosentswieg found a
six-minute dose of UV light, on each
side of the trunk, finding improved
performance on a bicycle ergometer
in college women. However, unlike the
Germans and Russians, I could find no
evidence that any of these American
findings interested any American
professionals involved in the care or
training of athletes.
Rosentsweig J.
The effect of a single suberythemic biodose of
ultraviolet radiation upon the strength of
college women. J Assoc Phys Ment Rehabil. 1967
Jul-Aug;21(4):131-3.
Cheatum BA.
Effects of a single biodose of ultraviolet
radiation upon the speed of college women. Res
Q. 1968 Oct;39(3):482-5.
Rosentswieg J.
The effect of a single suberythemic biodose of
ultraviolet radiation upon the endurance of
college women. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1969
Jun;9(2):104-6.
2. Athletic performance peaks in the summer when
vitamin D levels peak, and is at its lowest in
the winter when vitamin D levels are at their
lowest.
True. The studies below - all I could find in the
literature - show tests of physical performance peak
in the summer, when vitamin D levels peak, start to
decline in early autumn, as vitamin D levels
decline, and athletic performance reaches its lowest
point in late winter, when vitamin D levels bottom
out. However, it is reasonable to assume that any
associations between athletic performance and summer
season may be due to "reverse causation." That is,
improved athletic performance in the summer might be
secondary to increased outdoor physical and
recreational activity in the warmer weather with an
indoor sedentary lifestyle during the colder
months. Maybe people have better athletic ability
in the summer because they exercise more. If that
is true - and using the same logic - athletic
performance should not begin to decline until late
autumn, because at most temperate latitudes early
fall weather is ideal for outdoor physical
activities.
However, some of the studies below controlled for
seasonal variations in time spent exercising.
Furthermore, besides a consistent positive
association of summer season with improved athletic
performance, the below studies found an abrupt - and
unexplained - reduction in athletic performance
beginning in the early fall - when vitamin D levels
decline - but when the weather is ideal for outdoor
activities.
For example, in 1956, German researchers found a
distinct seasonal variation in the trainability of
musculature, studying wrist flexor strength in 21
German subjects undergoing daily training. They
found highly significant seasonal differences with
peak performance during the later part of the
summer, nadirs in the winter, and an unexplained
sharp autumn decline beginning in October.
Hettinger T, Muller EA. Seasonal course of
trainability of musculature. Int Z Angew Physiol.
1956;16(2):90-4.
A study of Polish pilots and crew found physical
fitness and tolerance to hypoxia were highest in the
late summer with an unexplained sharp decline
starting in September. The authors hypothesized
that seasonal variations in an unidentified
hormone best explained their results.
Kwarecki K, Golec L, Klossowski M, Zuzewicz K.
Circannual rhythms of physical fitness and tolerance
of hypoxic hypoxia. Acta Physiol Pol. 1981
Nov-Dec;32(6):629-36.
Cumulative work ability among 1,835 mainly sedentary
Norwegian men during bicycle exercise tests showed
an August peak, a sharp decline starting in the
autumn, and a wintertime nadir. There were no
seasonal changes in body weights, as might be
expected if more caloric-demanding recreational
activity during the sunnier months explained their
results.
Erikssen J, Rodahl K. Seasonal variation in work
performance and heart rate response to exercise. A
study of 1,835 middle-aged men. Eur J Appl Physiol
Occup Physiol. 1979 Oct;42(2):133-40.
Koch and Raschka reviewed the mostly German
literature on the seasonality of physical
performance, discussing studies indicating that
muscle strength and stamina peak in the late summer.
The authors then attempted to control for seasonal
variations in the time spent exercising by
instituting a controlled yearlong training regimen,
beginning in December. The training regimen
consisted of at least 20 push-ups per day and 2 or 3
long-distances races per week for the entire year.
They found the both the number of push-ups and
muscle strength peaked in late summer followed by a
rapid decline in the fall, and a nadir in the
winter, despite continued training. They concluded
that seasonal variations in an unidentified hormone
best explained their results. In addition, by now
we all know that vitamin D is a seasonal hormone,
and a steroid hormone precursor to boot.
Koch
H, Raschka C. Circannual period of physical
performance analysed by means of standard cosinor
analysis: a case report. Rom J Physiol. 2000
Jan-Dec;37(1-4):51-8.
3. Vitamin D has direct muscle-building (anabolic)
effects.
True, but only in vitamin D deficient subjects.
Both animal and human studies have found that
vitamin D directly affects muscle. That is,
vitamin D increases muscle mass.
For example, Birge and Haddad found that vitamin
D caused new protein synthesis in rat muscle.
Birge
SJ, Haddad JG. 25-hydroxycholecalciferol
stimulation of muscle metabolism. J Clin Invest.
1975 Nov;56(5):1100-7.
What about humans? In 1981, Young performed
muscle biopsies on 12 severely vitamin D
deficient patients before and after vitamin D
treatment. They found type-II (fast-twitch)
muscle fibers were small before treatment and
significantly enlarged after treatment.
Sorensen performed muscle biopsies on eleven
older patients with osteoporosis before and
after treatment with vitamin D.
The percentage and area of fast twitch fibers
increased significantly after treatment, despite
the lack of any physical training.
Young A, Edwards R, Jones D, Brenton D.
Quadriceps muscle strength and fibre size during
treatment of osteomalacia. In: Stokes IAF (ed)
Mechanical factors and the skeleton. 1981. pp
137-145.
Sorensen OH,
Lund B, Saltin B, Lund B, Andersen RB, Hjorth L,
Melsen F, Mosekilde L. Myopathy in bone loss of
ageing: improvement by treatment with 1
alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol and calcium. Clin
Sci (Lond). 1979 Feb;56(2):157-61.
Sato reported that two years of treatment with
1,000 IU of vitamin D per day significantly
increased muscle strength, doubled the mean
diameter, and tripled the percentage of
fast-twitch muscle fibers, in the functional
limbs of 48 severely vitamin D deficient elderly
stroke patients.
The placebo control group suffered declines in
muscle strength, and in the size and percentage
of fast-twitch muscle fibers.
Sato Y, Iwamoto
J, Kanoko T, Satoh K. Low-Dose Vitamin D
Prevents Muscular Atrophy and Reduces Falls and
Hip Fractures in Women after Stroke: A
Randomized Controlled Trial. Cerebrovasc Dis.
2005 Jul 27;20(3):187-192 [Epub ahead of print]
These studies clearly show that vitamin D
when administered to vitamin D deficient
people stimulates the growth and number of
those muscle fibers critical to athletic
ability, type-2, or "fast twitch," muscle
fibers.
4. Many studies have found direct
associations between physical performance
and vitamin D levels. That is, the higher
your vitamin D level, the better your
athletic performance.
True. I found 13 positive studies of
associations between vitamin D levels and
various parameters of neuromuscular
performance. However, they were all in old
people. Of course, old people can be athletes
too. Furthermore, age differences in physiology
and pharmacology are quantitative, not
qualitative. That is, what is true in old
people will be true in young people, although
the magnitude might be different. Higher
vitamin D levels are associated with a wide
variety of athletic performance but appear to
have the strongest associations with balance,
timing, and timed tests of physical
performance.
The three largest studies had
more than 7,000 elderly subjects. All
found evidence of a vitamin D threshold of
between 30 - 50 ng/ml, above which further
improvements in athletic performance were not
seen.
Wicherts and her colleagues found a
linear correlation between vitamin D and
neuromuscular performance; scores were 78%
better for those with vitamin D levels greater
than 30 ng/ml compared to those with levels less
than10 ng/ml.
Bischoff HA,
Stahelin HB, Urscheler N, Ehrsam R, Vonthein R,
Perrig-Chiello P, Tyndall A, Theiler R. Muscle
strength in the elderly: its relation to vitamin D
metabolites. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999
Jan;80(1):54-8.
Interestingly, all three studies that looked for
an association between mental abilities and
vitamin D levels found one. A fourth study,
unrelated to athletic function, also found an
association. The obvious explanation for these
findings is that cognitively impaired patients
do not go outdoors as often as higher
functioning patients and thus have lower vitamin
D levels. However, Dhesi found the association
after excluding all but mildly demented
patients, making such an explanation more
difficult. Flicker and - more recently -
Przybelski and Binkley, found the association
after controlling for outdoor activities,
raising the possibility that the association of
vitamin D levels with cognitive abilities is
casual. Both the vitamin D receptor and the
enzyme necessary to activate vitamin D are
present in a wide-variety of human brain
tissue. If vitamin D deficiency impairs
cognitive abilities, it is likely that such
deficiencies will also impair the brain's
ability to process the complex circuits needed
for peak athletic performance.
Dhesi JK, Bearne
LM, Moniz C, Hurley MV, Jackson SH, Swift CG, Allain
TJ. Neuromuscular and psychomotor function in
elderly subjects who fall and the relationship with
vitamin D status. J Bone Miner Res. 2002
May;17(5):891-7.
Kenny AM, Biskup B,
Robbins B, Marcella G, Burleson JA. Effects of
vitamin D supplementation on strength, physical
function, and health perception in older,
community-dwelling men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003
Dec;51(12):1762-7.
There can be no doubt that higher vitamin D
levels are associated with improved athletic
performance in the elderly. From what we know
of physiology and pharmacology, the same
associations should hold true in young people,
including young athletes.
5. Numerous studies have found that vitamin D
improves physical performance.
True, but, again, most all the studies are in
old persons, not young ones, and none of the
studies are in world-class athletes. However,
there is no medical reason why vitamin D would
improve the athletic performance of vitamin D
deficient old people but not vitamin D deficient
young ones. Eleven studies found vitamin D
improved physical performance, mainly on
measures of balance and reaction time. The one
study of younger subjects showed dramatic
physical performance effects in 55 severely
vitamin D deficient women.
Sorensen OH,
Lund B, Saltin B, Lund B, Andersen RB, Hjorth L,
Melsen F, Mosekilde L. Myopathy in bone loss of
ageing: improvement by treatment with 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol
and calcium. Clin Sci (Lond). 1979
Feb;56(2):157-61.
Gloth FM 3rd, Smith CE, Hollis BW, Tobin JD.
Functional improvement with vitamin D
replenishment in a cohort of frail, vitamin
D-deficient older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995
Nov;43(11):1269-71.
Glerup H,
Mikkelsen K, Poulsen L, Hass E, Overbeck S,
Andersen H, Charles P, Eriksen EF.
Hypovitaminosis D myopathy without biochemical
signs of osteomalacic bone involvement. Calcif
Tissue Int. 2000 Jun;66(6):419-24.
Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Dick W, Akos
R, Knecht M, Salis C, Nebiker M, Theiler
R, Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Lew RA,
Conzelmann M. Effects of vitamin D and
calcium supplementation on falls: a
randomized controlled trial. J Bone
Miner Res. 2003 Feb;18(2):343-51.
In summary, five converging - but
totally separate - lines of scientific
evidence leave little doubt that vitamin
D improves athletic performance. (I
actually left out a sixth line of
evidence, something a little more
complicated, studies of muscle strength
and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms;
the two studies I could find were both
positive.) Anyway, the scientific
evidence that UVB radiation, either from
the sun or from sunbeds, will
improve athletic performance is
overwhelming and the mechanism is almost
certainly vitamin D production. Peak
athletic performance will probably occur
with 25(OH)D levels of about 50 ng/ml,
whether from sun, sunbeds, or
supplements.
All that is missing is a big-time
professional or college team identifying
and then treating their elite athletes
who are vitamin D deficient. Can you
imagine what such performance-enhancing
effects would do for basketball players,
most of who are African American and
who practice and play indoors all
winter? Or gymnasts? Or weight
lifters?
However, a word of caution. The above
studies suggest that taking too much
vitamin D (more than 5,000 IU per day)
may actually worsen athletic
performance. Take the right amount, not
all you can swallow. Take enough to
keep your 25(OH)D levels around 50
ng/ml, year round. Easier
yet, regularly use the sun in the summer
and sunbeds in the winter - with care
not to burn. Once a week should
be about right.
When you think about it, none of this
should surprise anyone. Every body
builder knows that steroid hormones can
improve athletic performance, certainly
increase muscle mass. Barry Bonds knows
they increase timing and power.
Moreover, activated vitamin D is as
potent a steroid hormone as exists in
the human body. However, unlike other
steroids, levels of activated vitamin D
in muscle and nerve tissue are primarily
regulated by sun exposure. That's
right, the rate-limiting step for the
cellular function (autocrine) of
activated vitamin D is under your
control. It depends on how much you put
in your both or go into the sun. It's
ironic that many athletes now avoid the
sun, organized baseball is even
promoting sun avoidance and sunblocks.
The ancient Greeks knew better; they had
there elite athletes train on the beach
and in the nude.
The medical literature indicates vitamin
D levels of about 50 ng/ml are
associated with peak athletic
performance. Of course, recent studies
show such levels are ideal for
preventing cancer, diabetes,
hypertension, influenza, multiple
sclerosis, major depression, cognitive
impairments, etc. But who cares about
all that disease stuff old people
get,we're talking about something really
important: speed, balance, reaction
time, muscle mass, muscle strength,
squats, reps, etc. And guess who's now
taking 4,000 IU/day? Yes he is, and he
tells me his timing is better, he can
jump a little higher, run a little
faster, and the ball feels "sweeter,"
whatever that means.
This is a periodic newsletter from the
Vitamin D Council,
a non-profit trying to end the epidemic of
vitamin D deficiency. If you don't want to
get the newsletter, please hit reply and let
us know. We don't copyright this
newsletter. Please feel free to reproduce
it and post it on Internet sites and blogs.
Remember, we are a non-profit educational
organization. Our pathetic finances are
available for public inspection. We rely on
donations to publish our newsletter and
maintain our website. Send your
tax-deductible contributions to:
The Vitamin D Council
9100 San Gregorio Road
Atascadero, CA 93422
Health information obtained from
Impac Health is for informational purposes only and is not a
substitute for seeking clinical advice or treatment
relating to any medical condition. If you have a concern
about your health, promptly consult a licensed
healthcare provider. |